
The fun, rewarding part of partial unemployment is free time. But free time can also be your worst enemy: you have nowhere to go everyday and no money (esp. when you can’t get paid because the unemployment payment system has been down for two fucking days). Of course, free time does enable you to go to classes. Unfortunately, classes cost money and you still need to look for a job (Good luck with that, by the way. I’ve been looking since January. I’ve only managed to score a part time one).
I still enrolled in classes regardless. I threw caution, and perhaps common sense, to the wind. How will I pay bills while doing this? I’m crossing my fingers and hoping for the best. Against what many would consider common sense, I’m taking graduate classes in art education. The book I have to read for introduction to art education is going to tell me all about how great having a creative mind is and how it’s going to change the future of the world. It’s A Whole New Mind: How Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future by Daniel Pink. I have to admit the title alone made me roll my eyes. I was thinking this book was in the same realm of the ridiculous “get in touch with your right side of the brain” drawing technique a professor tried to force-feed us undergrads at CCRI. She kept harping on a book that taught how to draw using the right side of your brain. The book also claims that anyone can learn to draw—I’m sure there are plenty of working artists who feel relieved at this news. I refuse to read the book till this day and cringe at the mention of it. Honestly, I believe some people are good at some things and others are not. It’s just a fact of life. (A math teacher can harp all day to me about math, it doesn’t mean I’m going to excel at it, ever.) If we were all good at the same things, life would be boring. It doesn’t mean that some skills are more important than others.
However, A Whole New Mind is actually interesting. Pink brings up some valid points. (And since my professor made us write a book report, I am going to exercise my—gasp— creativity and talk about it in a manner I couldn’t have done in a homework assignment, creative curses and all!) He refers to two different ways of thinking: L-Directed thinking, which is literal, analytical, and logical (exemplified in people with MBA’s, lawyers, and accountants); and R-Directed thinking, which is emotional, intuitive, and nonlinear (exemplified in artsy-fartsy types). Until now, society has embraced L-Directed thinking and frowned upon R-Directed thinking. For instance, people used to ask me, after hearing that my major was graphic design, what I was going to do after graduating. I typically refrained from a sarcastic answer: “Live in a cardboard box in Central Park, like Jean-Michel Basquiat!” However, using just L-Directed thinking is no longer enough in the job market, you have to combine that with R-Directed thinking. This is good news to those in creative fields.
Daniel Pink, explains why L-Directed thinking is becoming less important due to abundance, Asia and automation. The abundance of material goods has caused the middle class to desire things—from children’s clothing to toilet brushes—that are not only functional, but also well-designed and beautiful. Wouldn’t it be nice to go on a Target or Kohls shopping spree and buy all that crap you don’t need? But, is all that stuff going to make you happy? As Pink insinuates, no, it won’t. Look at the surge of interest in yoga, meditation, and spirituality. People are looking for something other than the crap they consume for fulfillment. Yet, oddly enough, they keep consuming it. Here’s a scary fact for you from page 53: When we can’t store our many things, we just throw them away. Polly Labarre notes, “The United States spends more on trash bags than ninety other countries spend on everything. In other words, the receptacles of our waste cost more than all of the goods consumed by nearly half of the world’s nations.” Besides abundance, another cause Pink talks of is Asia. The job market is changing, and many jobs are moving to countries where people can live on less money. These foreign workers are just as knowledgeable as US workers but the standard of living in their countries isn’t as high as in the US and they get paid far less: an accountant in the Philippines makes approximately the same amount of money that I do with my part time job and unemployment checks and lives far better than I do! The average income in the Philippines is about $500 a month. I’m thinking I’d be a fucking millionaire if I lived there. The final cause is automation. Robots and computers are now doing jobs that people used to do. Enough said.
I’m not exactly sure if reading this book makes me want to laugh, cry, or rejoice. The author makes all these grand statements about how an MFA is now the new MBA. How companies are now sending recruiters to art schools across the country to hire creative people to work for them. This sounds amazing! It sounds like everything a partially unemployed artist wants to hear. But the book was published in 2004—it was published four years after I graduated with an almighty degree in fine arts. Every art related job I’ve had has laid me off, except for my volunteer position at Gallery X. I have been on and off unemployment for ten years! I could think I’m a shitty worker, if not for the dozens of other unemployed or underemployed artists. Maybe we artists haven’t looked in the right places? Maybe we’ve had shit for luck in the job market? I can’t decide.
edited by AC Martínez