As I sit here, staring at my copy of A literate Passion: the letters of Anaïs Nin and Henry Miller 1932 – 1953, I am reminded of how Henry Miller’s books were considered so obscene that his work was banned in America until the 60′s. There is a comment on the front cover of A literate Passion that claims that the book may “disturb some with their intimacy.” How intimacy ‘disturbs’ people, I don’t know… but I hear those feelings of passion, lust and the like, do in fact, disturb, a select few—I don’t get those people. How does one live without passion, without lust, with out feelings of the erotic, without intimacy, and still consider themselves… human?


The first time I put images up online, back in 2000, someone complained to the website, that was hosting, the artist pages about my work. The website promptly removed most of my images. I was appalled, how could anyone get offended over a series of angels and devils?! Okay, they were all nude. My thought process of the angels and devils series was that we all hold the potential for good and we all hold the potential for evil. They’re all being angels was based on the idea that “Lucifer” was a fallen angel, but an angel none the less.

I presume, the person who had complained hadn’t studied art history too closely. Hello, Greek sculpture of gods and goddess? ideal, beauty? Like it or not, many of it was their erotic art, you can’t look at a single Greek god or goddess and tell me otherwise.
Upon receiving the news that my works had been taken off the site, I wrote to every artist on the site and told them what had happened. In a strange complement to my persuasive writing ability, one artist told me I should write an op-ed piece. Another artist told me that my work wasn’t that good. Eh, art is subjective, and I had possibly found the culprit of the complaint.
Fast forward about eight years and my first curating of what got Gallery X the most publicity we ever received for an exhibit: Sex at the X. One would think, think, that the title alone would prepare some folks for what’s in store. Just in case it didn’t, we put up signs proclaiming ‘viewer discretion advised.’ We still received angry letters and the like. There was even a local radio talk show host who talked about how offensive the show was, every single day for a week! No publicity is bad publicity.
I received an angry letter for our second bout with Sex at the X, which brought in a revenue for our gallery (in a recession!) and drew a big crowd for the opening. I guess not everyone is offended by what is a human act, human feelings: sexuality, desire, lust. If, as an artist, you can’t express such feelings and human concepts, freely, then there’s not much to paint, to sculpt, to bother with creating. And Henry Miller and Anaïs Nin would roll over in their graves, along with a host of other passionate, human, creative types.

I seen the other day an article about Johnny Weir, after some commentators had said some not so nice things about him – say what you will, the dude can skate! He didn’t demand an apology, though he deserves one. Though an apology would’ve been half-hearted, and would it truly right a wrong? No, which is probably why he didn’t demand one. This whole thing reminded me of freedom of speech and a balance of differing opinions does keep everyone on their toes, true. It still bothers me that there are those that want to revoke our freedom so that they can assert their own ignorance, close mindedness, and intolerance.
I think it makes us realize we must strongly believe in the art we put forth, for those critics (who may or may not be better than us) that will cut us down the minute they can voice an opinion, the instant you hang it on the wall, put it on a pedestal, perform it, write the words.